Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Obsidian vs Omi

Obsidian is an MCP server published by MarkusPfundstein. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Omi is an MCP server published by BasedHardware. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceObsidianOmi
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:0eba4c05742a
Forks (GitHub): 504
Pulls (Docker Hub): 141 707
Stars (Docker Hub): 31
Stars (GitHub): 4 471
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: sha256:674097f43757
Forks (GitHub): 2 592
Pulls (Docker Hub): 33 749
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 13 690
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Obsidian vs Omi
FactObsidianOmi
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)4 471 (worse)13 690 (better)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)141 707 (better)33 749 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)504 (worse)2 592 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/obsidian)On your machine (mcp/omi)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)126
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 11, secrets among them: 1
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/markuspfundstein/mcp-obsidiangithub.com/basedhardware/omi
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

Tools each declares

Only Obsidian declares

  • obsidian_append_content
  • obsidian_batch_get_file_contents
  • obsidian_complex_search
  • obsidian_delete_file
  • obsidian_get_file_contents
  • obsidian_get_periodic_note
  • obsidian_get_recent_changes
  • obsidian_get_recent_periodic_notes
  • obsidian_list_files_in_dir
  • obsidian_list_files_in_vault
  • obsidian_patch_content
  • obsidian_simple_search

Only Omi declares

  • create_memory
  • delete_memory
  • edit_memory
  • get_conversation_by_id
  • get_conversations
  • get_memories

Both declare

None

Tool names as each marketplace publishes them. More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.

Settings each asks for

Only Obsidian asks for

  • OBSIDIAN_API_KEY (secret)
  • OBSIDIAN_HOST

Only Omi asks for

  • OMI_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Obsidian · What it can do: Omi · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built