Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

OpenAPI Toolkit vs InvoiceForge

OpenAPI Toolkit is an MCP server published by lepoco. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). InvoiceForge is an MCP server published by agenttoolworks.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpenAPI ToolkitInvoiceForge
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:26234065b6a7
Forks (GitHub): 3
Pulls (Docker Hub): 43 542
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 18
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

OpenAPI Toolkit vs InvoiceForge
FactOpenAPI ToolkitInvoiceForge
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)18 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)43 542No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)3 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/openapi)Remote server (invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)5Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 0Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/lepoco/openapi.clientgithub.com/agenttoolworks/mcp-servers
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 10 h ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

OpenAPI Toolkit

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Fetch, validate, and generate code or curl from any OpenAPI or Swagger spec - all from a single URL.

InvoiceForge

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Generate, validate and read EN 16931 and Peppol BIS 3.0 e-invoices, in UBL and CII.

How to run each

OpenAPI Toolkit As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio openapi -- docker run -i --rm mcp/openapi

InvoiceForge As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http invoiceforge https://invoiceforge.agenttoolworks.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only InvoiceForge has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of InvoiceForge publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of InvoiceForge publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: OpenAPI Toolkit · What it can do: InvoiceForge · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built