Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Sequa.AI vs Feedbacks

Sequa.AI is an MCP server published by sequa-ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Feedbacks is an MCP server published by Softinator-TechLabs. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceSequa.AIFeedbacks
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:f4e0e271c5c5
Forks (GitHub): 5
Pulls (Docker Hub): 10 257
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 22
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.2.2
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 34
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Sequa.AI vs Feedbacks
FactSequa.AIFeedbacks
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)22 (worse)34 (better)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)10 257No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/sequa)On your machine (https://github.com/Softinator-TechLabs/feedbacks-plugins/releases/download/v0.2.2/feedbacks-mcp-0.2.2.mcpb)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/sequa-ai/sequa-mcpgithub.com/softinator-techlabs/feedbacks-oss
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Sequa.AI

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Stop stitching context for Copilot and Cursor. With Sequa MCP, your AI tools know your entire codebase and docs out of the box.

Feedbacks

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Visual website feedback, screenshots and team discussion for coding assistants. Self-hosted.

How to run each

Sequa.AI As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "API_KEY=<YOUR_API_KEY>" --transport stdio sequa -- docker run -i --rm -e API_KEY mcp/sequa

Requires: API_KEY (secret)

Feedbacks

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Feedbacks publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Feedbacks publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Sequa.AI · What it can do: Feedbacks · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built