Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Zen vs Codexbox

Zen is an MCP server published by BeehiveInnovations. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Codexbox is an MCP server published by psyb0t. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceZenCodexbox
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:02cbe1d325db
Forks (GitHub): 1 035
Pulls (Docker Hub): 34 868
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 11 775
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.7.2
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Zen vs Codexbox
FactZenCodexbox
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)11 775 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)34 868No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 035 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-12
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/zen)On your machine (docker.io/psyb0t/codexbox:v0.7.2)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)18Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)4, secrets among them: 4Not published
Licence (differs)NOASSERTIONNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/beehiveinnovations/zen-mcp-servergithub.com/psyb0t/docker-codexbox
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Zen

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Bridges multiple AI models and CLIs, enabling orchestrated workflows across Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, and other AI development tools.

Codexbox

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Self-hosted MCP server: run OpenAI Codex CLI prompts and manage workspace files.

How to run each

Zen As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "GEMINI_API_KEY=<YOUR_GEMINI_API_KEY>" --env "OPENAI_API_KEY=<YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY>" --env "OPENROUTER_API_KEY=<YOUR_OPENROUTER_API_KEY>" --env "XAI_API_KEY=<YOUR_XAI_API_KEY>" --transport stdio zen -- docker run -i --rm -e GEMINI_API_KEY -e OPENAI_API_KEY -e OPENROUTER_API_KEY -e XAI_API_KEY mcp/zen

Requires: GEMINI_API_KEY (secret), OPENAI_API_KEY (secret), OPENROUTER_API_KEY (secret), XAI_API_KEY (secret)

Codexbox

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Codexbox publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Codexbox publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Zen · What it can do: Codexbox · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built