Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Engineering vs io.github.riponcm/projectmem

Engineering is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Anthropic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude: knowledge-work-plugins). io.github.riponcm/projectmem is an MCP server published by riponcm. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceEngineeringio.github.riponcm/projectmem
Claude: knowledge-work-plugins Listed
Version: 1.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 3 317
Stars (GitHub): 29 279
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.3.4
Forks (GitHub): 48
Stars (GitHub): 861
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Engineering vs io.github.riponcm/projectmem
FactEngineeringio.github.riponcm/projectmem
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)29 279 (better)861 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)3 317 (better)48 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (projectmem)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)20Not a bundle
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsgithub.com/riponcm/projectmem
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Engineering

In its own words, on Claude: knowledge-work-plugins:

Streamline engineering workflows — standups, code review, architecture decisions, incident response, and technical documentation. Works with your existing tools or standalone.

io.github.riponcm/projectmem

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.

How to run each

Engineering

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

io.github.riponcm/projectmem As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio projectmem -- uvx projectmem

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Engineering · What it can do: io.github.riponcm/projectmem · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built