Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

TinyFish vs Browsentic

TinyFish is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). Browsentic is an MCP server published by imshaikot. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceTinyFishBrowsentic
Cursor: cursor/plugins Listed
Version: 1.0.1
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.8.9
Forks (GitHub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 34
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

TinyFish vs Browsentic
FactTinyFishBrowsentic
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub34
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub4
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-12
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (agent.tinyfish.ai/mcp)On your machine (browsentic)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)1Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cursor/pluginsgithub.com/imshaikot/browsentic
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)01
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)not checked yetno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

TinyFish

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Browse and automate the web with TinyFish: run multi-step web automations, search the web, extract clean page content, and drive remote stealth browser sessions.

Browsentic

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Agentic browser harness: your agent CLI in your real, signed-in browser, from a side panel or MCP.

How to run each

TinyFish

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Browsentic As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio browsentic -- npx -y browsentic

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: TinyFish · What it can do: Browsentic · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built