Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

com.auto-reader/ocr vs Docpick

com.auto-reader/ocr is an MCP server published by auto-reader.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Docpick is an MCP server published by ArkNill. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-12. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacecom.auto-reader/ocrDocpick
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.3
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

com.auto-reader/ocr vs Docpick
Factcom.auto-reader/ocrDocpick
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)1 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)1 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.auto-reader.com/mcp)On your machine (docpick)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/samqra/auto-reader-ocrgithub.com/quartzunit/docpick
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)not checked yetno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

com.auto-reader/ocr

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Arabic-first OCR, translation and document extraction. First call mints a free trial key.

Docpick

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Schema-driven document extraction with local OCR + LLM. Document in, Structured JSON out.

How to run each

com.auto-reader/ocr As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ocr https://api.auto-reader.com/mcp

Docpick As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio docpick -- uvx docpick

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: com.auto-reader/ocr · What it can do: Docpick · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built