Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Permissions and history

Is HatoNavi YouTube History Manager safe to install?

HatoNavi YouTube History Manager asks for 2 browser permissions and 1 site pattern. We do not audit code and we do not judge intent; what we can show is what the listing declares and whether that has changed while we have been watching.

HatoNavi YouTube History Manager

Chrome extension by mpcsaku · Lifestyle · Entertainment

Open in the Chrome Web Store
What the developer says, and 1 screenshot

Loading from the Chrome Web Store. Open the listing if it does not appear.

At a glance

Facts, not a score: an ad blocker needs every page and a theme needs nothing, so one number would be wrong about both. Each fact links to its detail.

Site access
Access to specific sites only
Data collection
Declares it collects none
Upkeep
Updated 237 days ago
Audience
88 users · 4.5/5

What data it declares

The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.

The developer also certifies that your data is not sold to third parties outside approved uses, not used for purposes unrelated to the extension's core function, and not used to decide creditworthiness or lending.

The listing links to a privacy policy.

This is the developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.

What Chrome asks you to allow

When you add it, Chrome asks you to allow it to:

Derived from the manifest by Chrome's documented rules; the dialog's exact wording depends on your Chrome version and language. Chrome asks again if an update requests more.

What it can reach

Specific sites only: 1 match pattern.

Worth knowing

Routine for an extension

Pages it runs its code on

It runs its own code on specific pages only: 1 site pattern.

A content script is code the extension injects into pages matching these patterns. On those pages it can read and change what you see, whether or not a host permission is listed above.

How usual this is for its category

In Lifestyle · Entertainment, 12% of extensions ask for access to every site. This one: Access to specific sites only.

The typical extension there declares 2 browser permissions; this one declares 2 browser permissions.

Counted over the live extensions of the same category after our latest full pass of the store. A share is context, not a verdict: what is normal depends on what the extension is for.

Who uses it and how it is kept up

88 users

Users
-8 since 31.08
83-111 · 31 readings
  1. 2026-08-3196
  2. 2026-09-0297
  3. 2026-09-0598
  4. 2026-09-0797
  5. 2026-09-0895
  6. 2026-09-0997
  7. 2026-09-1098
  8. 2026-09-1394
  9. 2026-09-1595
  10. 2026-09-1692
  11. 2026-09-2588
  12. 2026-09-2692
  13. 2026-10-04101
  14. 2026-10-08103
  15. 2026-10-10106
  16. 2026-10-13104
  17. 2026-10-16108
  18. 2026-10-17109
  19. 2026-10-20108
  20. 2026-10-21106
  21. 2026-10-22105
  22. 2026-10-23107
  23. 2026-10-24110
  24. 2026-10-25111
  25. 2026-10-28104
  26. 2026-10-29102
  27. 2026-10-3097
  28. 2026-11-0186
  29. 2026-11-0483
  30. 2026-11-0686
  31. 2026-11-0788

What the store shows

Has it asked for more over time?

This is the question a permission list on its own cannot answer. An extension that shipped narrow and widened later is a different proposition from one that always asked for the same thing.

The permissions this extension requests have not changed since we started watching it.

Who publishes it

mpcsaku, who publishes 12 listings we track. This listing has been in the store since 2025-10-19 and was last updated on 2026-03-15.

Similar extensions that ask for less

Listings close to this one in what they say they do, which declare less reach. Less reach is not a verdict on either: compare what each needs for the job.

  1. YouTube History Columns No permissions at all · No permissions declared 6 users
  2. WatchBack+ No site access · 3 permissions 4 users
  3. YouTube Watch History Pro Access to specific sites only · 1 permission, 2 site patterns 46 users

How to check or remove it in Chrome

  1. Type chrome://extensions in the address bar and find the extension in the list.
  2. Open its details. The site access setting shows where it can run; set it to run only on click and it reaches a page only after you press its icon.
  3. To uninstall it, choose Remove on the same page.

Questions people ask

What can HatoNavi YouTube History Manager access?
Specific sites only: 1 match pattern. It declares 2 browser permissions.
What data does HatoNavi YouTube History Manager collect?
The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data. This is the developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.
Has HatoNavi YouTube History Manager asked for more permissions over time?
The permissions this extension requests have not changed since we started watching it.
Does HatoNavi YouTube History Manager publish a privacy policy?
Yes, the store listing links to a privacy policy.

We read the public store listing up to 2 times a day and keep what it declared. We do not install the extension, do not audit its code, do not judge its intent and publish no contact details for its developer. Last read on 2026-11-07.

Back to HatoNavi YouTube History Manager · Alternatives to HatoNavi YouTube History Manager

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built