Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Canvas Fingerprint Defender vs WebGL Fingerprint Defender

Canvas Fingerprint Defender has 100k users and WebGL Fingerprint Defender has 70k users (last published figure), as of our catalog pass of 2026-11-05. Each is among the other's three closest listings by what they say they do, and both have at least 10 000 users.

The facts side by side

Canvas Fingerprint Defender vs WebGL Fingerprint Defender
FactCanvas Fingerprint DefenderWebGL Fingerprint Defender
Users (differs)100 00070 000
Users, last 30 days (differs)+50 000 (worse)+60 000 (better)
Rating (differs)3.7 (better)3.5 (worse)
Number of ratings (differs)75 (better)32 (worse)
CategoryMake Chrome Yours · PrivacyMake Chrome Yours · Privacy
Publisher (differs)YubiKeller
Site accessRuns its code on every siteRuns its code on every site
Browser permissions3 browser permissions3 browser permissions
Data collectionDeclares it collects noneDeclares it collects none
Versions in the last 90 daysnonenone
Version (differs)0.2.30.1.9
Updated in the store (differs)2026-05-26 (worse)2026-06-01 (better)
Published (differs)2018-02-042019-06-03
ManifestV3V3
Featured badge (differs)No (worse)Yes (better)
Established publisher badgeNoNo
Privacy policy (differs)No (worse)Yes (better)
Declared traderNoNo
Download size (differs)48 KiB54 KiB
Languages1 language1 language

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more users, faster growth over 30 days, a higher rating, more ratings, a fresher update, more new versions, more languages, a store badge, a privacy policy), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Permissions, site access, declared data, size and time in the store are marked only as different: fewer or more is not better in itself.

Canvas Fingerprint Defender

100k users

Users
unchanged since 01.09
40k-200k · 10 readings
  1. 2026-09-01100k
  2. 2026-09-17200k
  3. 2026-09-21100k
  4. 2026-09-2590k
  5. 2026-09-26100k
  6. 2026-10-0450k
  7. 2026-10-2240k
  8. 2026-10-2950k
  9. 2026-11-01100k
  10. 2026-11-05100k
  • Last updated in the store 163 days ago, on 2026-05-26.
  • No new version in the last 90 days.

WebGL Fingerprint Defender

70k users (last published figure)

Users
+10k since 01.09
0-100k · 12 readings
  1. 2026-09-0160k
  2. 2026-09-0270k
  3. 2026-09-0580k
  4. 2026-09-1090k
  5. 2026-09-130
  6. 2026-09-15100k
  7. 2026-09-2560k
  8. 2026-09-2670k
  9. 2026-10-0510k
  10. 2026-10-2930k
  11. 2026-11-0170k
  12. 2026-11-0570k
  • Last updated in the store 157 days ago, on 2026-06-01.
  • No new version in the last 90 days.

What one asks for and the other does not

Canvas Fingerprint Defender: Runs its code on every site. WebGL Fingerprint Defender: Runs its code on every site.

Both declare the same browser permissions and the same site access.

Declared reach only. Asking for less is not a verdict on safety: compare what each needs for the job.

What data each declares

Canvas Fingerprint Defender: The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.

WebGL Fingerprint Defender: The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.

The two declarations name the same kinds of data.

This is each developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.

Who is updated more often

Neither has shipped a new version in the last 90 days.

Figures come from the public Chrome Web Store, which our own crawler reads up to 2 times a day. We do not install or audit extensions and publish no contact details for their developers. Catalog pass of .

Is it safe: Canvas Fingerprint Defender · Is it safe: WebGL Fingerprint Defender · Alternatives to Canvas Fingerprint Defender · Compare two other extensions

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built