Intel SSO Auto-Continue vs OctoSSO
Intel SSO Auto-Continue has 11 users and OctoSSO has 11 users, as of our catalog pass of 2026-11-02. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Intel SSO Auto-Continue | OctoSSO |
|---|---|---|
| Users | 11 | 11 |
| Users, last 30 days (differs) | +1 (worse) | +2 (better) |
| Rating (differs) | not rated yet | 5.0 |
| Number of ratings (differs) | 0 (worse) | 2 (better) |
| Category | Productivity · Tools | Productivity · Tools |
| Publisher (differs) | amitai.irron | ganta |
| Site access | No permissions at all | No permissions at all |
| Browser permissions | no browser permissions | no browser permissions |
| Data collection | Declares it collects none | Declares it collects none |
| Versions in the last 90 days | none | none |
| Version (differs) | 1.0 | 1.2.1 |
| Updated in the store (differs) | 2026-01-21 (worse) | 2026-03-18 (better) |
| Published (differs) | 2026-01-21 | 2020-09-17 |
| Manifest | V3 | V3 |
| Featured badge | No | No |
| Established publisher badge | No | No |
| Privacy policy | No | No |
| Declared trader | No | No |
| Download size (differs) | 4 KiB | 20 KiB |
| Languages | 1 language | 1 language |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more users, faster growth over 30 days, a higher rating, more ratings, a fresher update, more new versions, more languages, a store badge, a privacy policy), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Permissions, site access, declared data, size and time in the store are marked only as different: fewer or more is not better in itself.
Intel SSO Auto-Continue
11 users
- 2026-08-318
- 2026-09-039
- 2026-09-048
- 2026-09-069
- 2026-09-078
- 2026-09-098
- 2026-09-130
- 2026-09-1511
- 2026-09-1710
- 2026-10-049
- 2026-10-088
- 2026-10-0910
- 2026-10-109
- 2026-10-1310
- 2026-10-1810
- 2026-10-2111
- 2026-10-2210
- 2026-10-2311
- 2026-10-2410
- 2026-10-2910
- 2026-11-0111
- 2026-11-0211
- Last updated in the store 285 days ago, on 2026-01-21.
- No new version in the last 90 days.
OctoSSO
11 users
- 2026-09-0111
- 2026-09-048
- 2026-09-059
- 2026-09-068
- 2026-09-0810
- 2026-09-109
- 2026-09-1310
- 2026-09-1511
- 2026-09-179
- 2026-09-2010
- 2026-09-259
- 2026-09-2610
- 2026-09-289
- 2026-10-0410
- 2026-10-0912
- 2026-10-1010
- 2026-10-1610
- 2026-10-1810
- 2026-10-2112
- 2026-10-2211
- 2026-10-2312
- 2026-10-2411
- 2026-10-2510
- 2026-10-2711
- 2026-10-2912
- 2026-11-0111
- 2026-11-0211
- Last updated in the store 229 days ago, on 2026-03-18.
- No new version in the last 90 days.
What one asks for and the other does not
Intel SSO Auto-Continue: No permissions at all. OctoSSO: No permissions at all.
Both declare the same browser permissions and the same site access.
Declared reach only. Asking for less is not a verdict on safety: compare what each needs for the job.
What data each declares
Intel SSO Auto-Continue: The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.
OctoSSO: The developer declares that it does not collect or use your data.
The two declarations name the same kinds of data.
This is each developer's own declaration in the Chrome Web Store. We cannot check it against what the extension does.
Who is updated more often
Neither has shipped a new version in the last 90 days.
Figures come from the public Chrome Web Store, which our own crawler reads up to 2 times a day. We do not install or audit extensions and publish no contact details for their developers. Catalog pass of .
Is it safe: Intel SSO Auto-Continue · Is it safe: OctoSSO · Alternatives to Intel SSO Auto-Continue · Compare two other extensions
Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built