Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Amazon CloudWatch Application Signals vs Xitoring

Amazon CloudWatch Application Signals is an MCP server published by awslabs. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Xitoring is an MCP server published by xitoring. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceAmazon CloudWatch Application SignalsXitoring
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:873bf1023b30
Forks (GitHub): 1 817
Pulls (Docker Hub): 14 035
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 9 794
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Amazon CloudWatch Application Signals vs Xitoring
FactAmazon CloudWatch Application SignalsXitoring
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)9 794 (better)1 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)14 035No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 817 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/cloudwatch-appsignals-mcp-server)Remote server (app.xitoring.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)13Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 0Not published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/awslabs/mcpgithub.com/xitoring/mcp-server
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 19 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Amazon CloudWatch Application Signals

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Application performance monitoring and insights.

Xitoring

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Connect AI assistants to Xitoring monitoring: servers, uptime, incidents, metrics, SSL, and alerts.

How to run each

Amazon CloudWatch Application Signals As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio awslabs-cloudwatch-appsignals -- docker run -i --rm mcp/cloudwatch-appsignals-mcp-server

Xitoring As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http xitoring https://app.xitoring.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_API_KEY>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Xitoring has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Xitoring publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Xitoring publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Amazon CloudWatch Application Signals · What it can do: Xitoring · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built