Bitrefill vs 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi
Bitrefill is an MCP server published by bitrefill. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi is an MCP server published by usefulapi.io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  Bitrefill |   17TRACK MCP by usefulapi |
|---|---|---|
| Docker MCP Catalog | Listed Version: sha256:7ff5cc499284 Forks (GitHub): 1 Pulls (Docker Hub): 39 274 Stars (Docker Hub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 2 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 1.0.0 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Bitrefill | 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 2 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs) | 39 274 | No figure on Docker Hub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 1 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (mcp/bitrefill) | Remote server (17track.usefulapi.io/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares (differs) | 12 | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 2, secrets among them: 1 | Not published |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/bitrefill/bitrefill-mcp-server | github.com/m190/usefulapi-mcp |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 0 | 2 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-12 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Responded 2 h ago, requires a key |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Bitrefill
A Model Context Protocol Server connector for Bitrefill public API, to enable AI agents to search and shop on Bitrefill.
17TRACK MCP by usefulapi
Track parcels across 3000+ carriers with 17TRACK: register numbers, read tracking events and quota.
How to run each
Bitrefill As a local MCP server: Docker image
claude mcp add --env "BITREFILL_API_SECRET=<YOUR_BITREFILL_API_SECRET>" --transport stdio bitrefill -- docker run -i --rm -e BITREFILL_API_SECRET mcp/bitrefillRequires: BITREFILL_API_SECRET (secret)
17TRACK MCP by usefulapi As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http 17track https://17track.usefulapi.io/mcpCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
The marketplaces of 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: Bitrefill · What it can do: 17TRACK MCP by usefulapi · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.