Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Box vs Japan EDINET Filing Index

Box is an MCP server published by dgageot. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Japan EDINET Filing Index is an MCP server published by mk-career-planning. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceBoxJapan EDINET Filing Index
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:4db7963505c2
Forks (GitHub): 0
Pulls (Docker Hub): 18 600
Stars (Docker Hub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Box vs Japan EDINET Filing Index
FactBoxJapan EDINET Filing Index
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)18 600No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/box)Remote server (jp-edinet-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)12Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/dgageot/mcp-server-boxNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-12
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 3 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Box

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

An MCP server capable of interacting with the Box API.

Japan EDINET Filing Index

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

What has this Japanese company filed on EDINET (FSA) in the last 365 days? Hosted. Facts only.

How to run each

Box As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "BOX_CLIENT_SECRET=<YOUR_BOX_CLIENT_SECRET>" --transport stdio box -- docker run -i --rm -e BOX_CLIENT_SECRET mcp/box

Requires: BOX_CLIENT_SECRET (secret)

Japan EDINET Filing Index As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http jp-edinet https://jp-edinet-production.mk-career-planning.workers.dev/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Japan EDINET Filing Index has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Japan EDINET Filing Index publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Japan EDINET Filing Index publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Box · What it can do: Japan EDINET Filing Index · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built