Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Camunda BPM Process Engine vs RoutineKit

Camunda BPM Process Engine is an MCP server published by lepoco. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). RoutineKit is an MCP server published by sjh9714. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceCamunda BPM Process EngineRoutineKit
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:fbea3848bcb6
Forks (GitHub): 5
Pulls (Docker Hub): 57 526
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 14
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Downloads/month (npm): 1 122
Downloads/week (npm): 359
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Camunda BPM Process Engine vs RoutineKit
FactCamunda BPM Process EngineRoutineKit
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)14 (better)1 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)57 526No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/camunda)On your machine (routinekit)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)12Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 02, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/lepoco/mcp-camundagithub.com/sjh9714/routinekit
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Camunda BPM Process Engine

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Tools to interact with the Camunda 7 Community Edition Engine using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Whether you're automating workflows, querying process instances, or integrating with external systems, Camunda MCP Server is your agentic solution for seamless interaction with Camunda.

RoutineKit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Capture tool workflows, save typed tools, and replay with human approval. Includes an MCP Apps UI.

How to run each

Camunda BPM Process Engine As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio camunda -- docker run -i --rm mcp/camunda

RoutineKit As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio routinekit -- npx -y routinekit mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of RoutineKit publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only Camunda BPM Process Engine asks for

  • CAMUNDA_HOST

Only RoutineKit asks for

  • ROUTINEKIT_CONFIG
  • ROUTINEKIT_HOME

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Camunda BPM Process Engine · What it can do: RoutineKit · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built