Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Close vs Job-application tracker

Close is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Job-application tracker is an MCP server published by butyavk. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceCloseJob-application tracker
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.4.3
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Close vs Job-application tracker
FactCloseJob-application tracker
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-19
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.close.com/mcp)On your machine (tracker-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 14, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/butyavk/tracker-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)07
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-19
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 3 days ago, requires a keyno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Close

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Streamline sales processes with integrated calling, email, SMS, and automated workflows for small and scaling businesses.

Job-application tracker

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Your job-application tracker in Excel, CSV or Google Sheets: follow-ups, funnel, confirmed writes

How to run each

Close As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http close https://mcp.close.com/mcp

Requires: CLOSE_API_KEY (secret)

Job-application tracker As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "TRACKER_PATH=<YOUR_TRACKER_PATH>" --transport stdio tracker-mcp -- uvx tracker-mcp

Requires: TRACKER_PATH

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Close has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only Close asks for

  • CLOSE_API_KEY (secret)

Only Job-application tracker asks for

  • GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS
  • TRACKER_BACKUP_DIR
  • TRACKER_CONFIG
  • TRACKER_PATH

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Close · What it can do: Job-application tracker · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built