Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Shodan vs VulnFeed

Shodan is an MCP server published by Cyreslab-AI. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). VulnFeed is an MCP server published by infai-tech. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-28. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceShodanVulnFeed
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:f99f2d2d6955
Forks (GitHub): 12
Pulls (Docker Hub): 46 873
Stars (Docker Hub): 8
Stars (GitHub): 52
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.3.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 652 (last published figure)
Downloads/week (PyPI): 65 (last published figure)
Forks (GitHub): 0 (last published figure)
Stars (GitHub): 1 (last published figure)
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Shodan vs VulnFeed
FactShodanVulnFeed
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)521 (last published figure)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)46 873No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)120 (last published figure)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/cyreslab-ai-shodan)On your machine (vulnfeed-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)5Not published
Environment variables it asks for1, secrets among them: 11, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cyreslab-ai/shodan-mcp-servergithub.com/infai-tech/vulnfeed-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Shodan

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

MCP server for Shodan — host/network recon, CVE and exploit lookup, InternetDB, and persistent alerts (34 tools).

VulnFeed

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Dependency vulnerability scanner with EPSS scoring. 9 MCP tools. Free tier + x402.

How to run each

Shodan As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "SHODAN_API_KEY=<YOUR_SHODAN_API_KEY>" --transport stdio cyreslab-ai-shodan -- docker run -i --rm -e SHODAN_API_KEY mcp/cyreslab-ai-shodan

Requires: SHODAN_API_KEY (secret)

VulnFeed As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "VULNFEED_API_KEY=<YOUR_VULNFEED_API_KEY>" --transport stdio vulnfeed -- uvx vulnfeed-mcp

Requires: VULNFEED_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of VulnFeed publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only Shodan asks for

  • SHODAN_API_KEY (secret)

Only VulnFeed asks for

  • VULNFEED_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Shodan · What it can do: VulnFeed · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built