Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

E2B vs ultracost

E2B is an MCP server published by e2b-dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). ultracost is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by danielkremen818. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceE2Bultracost
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:ff4f9608cc4c
Forks (GitHub): 72
Pulls (Docker Hub): 23 248
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 393
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Community marketplace davepoon/buildwithclaude Not listed Listed
Version: 0.4.5
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

E2B vs ultracost
FactE2Bultracost
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)393 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)23 248No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)72 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/e2b)Installs as a plugin bundle
Transport (differs)stdioNot stated
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Hooks it runs (differs)Not published4
Parts of the bundle (differs)Not a bundle16
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0MIT
Repository (differs)github.com/e2b-dev/mcp-servergithub.com/danielkremen818/ultracost
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-15

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

E2B

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Giving Claude ability to run code with E2B via MCP (Model Context Protocol).

ultracost

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Per-stage model routing + pre-flight cost gate for Claude Code ultracode dynamic workflows. Pins an explicit model + effort on every agent subagent stage, estimates cost before launch, and ships a static guard + PreToolUse gate that flag stages which would silently inherit the session's Opus model. Zero dependencies, no telemetry, MIT.

How to run each

E2B As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "E2B_API_KEY=<YOUR_E2B_API_KEY>" --transport stdio e2b -- docker run -i --rm -e E2B_API_KEY mcp/e2b

Requires: E2B_API_KEY (secret)

ultracost As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add davepoon/buildwithclaude
/plugin install ultracost@buildwithclaude

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of ultracost publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of ultracost publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: E2B · What it can do: ultracost · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built