Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

E2B vs CleanCode AI

E2B is an MCP server published by e2b-dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). CleanCode AI is an MCP server published by Evozim. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceE2BCleanCode AI
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:ff4f9608cc4c
Forks (GitHub): 72
Pulls (Docker Hub): 23 229
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 393
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

E2B vs CleanCode AI
FactE2BCleanCode AI
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)393No figure on GitHub
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)23 229No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)72No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/e2b)Remote server (cleancode-ai-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioSSE
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/e2b-dev/mcp-serverNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkAnswered with HTTP 402 (2 days ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

E2B

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Giving Claude ability to run code with E2B via MCP (Model Context Protocol).

CleanCode AI

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Automated codebase refactoring and type safety validator.

How to run each

E2B As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "E2B_API_KEY=<YOUR_E2B_API_KEY>" --transport stdio e2b -- docker run -i --rm -e E2B_API_KEY mcp/e2b

Requires: E2B_API_KEY (secret)

CleanCode AI As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport sse cleancode-ai https://cleancode-ai-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp --header "payment-signature: <YOUR_PAYMENT_SIGNATURE>"

Requires: payment-signature header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only CleanCode AI has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of CleanCode AI publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of CleanCode AI publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: E2B · What it can do: CleanCode AI · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built