Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

E2B vs io.github.NickCirv/engram

E2B is an MCP server published by e2b-dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). io.github.NickCirv/engram is an MCP server published by NickCirv. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceE2Bio.github.NickCirv/engram
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:ff4f9608cc4c
Forks (GitHub): 72
Pulls (Docker Hub): 23 208
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 393
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 4.5.0
Downloads/month (npm): 602
Downloads/week (npm): 213
Forks (GitHub): 14
Stars (GitHub): 142
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

E2B vs io.github.NickCirv/engram
FactE2Bio.github.NickCirv/engram
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)393 (better)142 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)23 208No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)72 (better)14 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/e2b)On your machine (engramx)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 15, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/e2b-dev/mcp-servergithub.com/nickcirv/engram
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

E2B

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Giving Claude ability to run code with E2B via MCP (Model Context Protocol).

io.github.NickCirv/engram

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Ranked local code-graph context for AI coding agents. Intercepts reads + greps. Apache-2.0.

How to run each

E2B As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "E2B_API_KEY=<YOUR_E2B_API_KEY>" --transport stdio e2b -- docker run -i --rm -e E2B_API_KEY mcp/e2b

Requires: E2B_API_KEY (secret)

io.github.NickCirv/engram As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "ENGRAM_API_TOKEN=<YOUR_ENGRAM_API_TOKEN>" --transport stdio engram -- npx -y engram-serve engramx

Requires: ENGRAM_API_TOKEN (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of io.github.NickCirv/engram publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only E2B asks for

  • E2B_API_KEY (secret)

Only io.github.NickCirv/engram asks for

  • ENGRAM_ANTHROPIC_MEMORY_PATH
  • ENGRAM_API_TOKEN (secret)
  • ENGRAM_MCP_CONFIG_PATH
  • ENGRAM_MISTAKE_GUARD
  • ENGRAM_NO_UPDATE_CHECK

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: E2B · What it can do: io.github.NickCirv/engram · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built