Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

E2B vs OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP

E2B is an MCP server published by e2b-dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP is an MCP server published by xiaojiou176-open. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceE2BOpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:ff4f9608cc4c
Forks (GitHub): 72
Pulls (Docker Hub): 23 248
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 393
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0a4
Downloads/month (PyPI): 142
Downloads/week (PyPI): 60
Forks (GitHub): 32
Stars (GitHub): 206
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

E2B vs OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP
FactE2BOpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)393 (better)206 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)23 248No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)72 (better)32 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/e2b)On your machine (openvibecoding-orchestrator)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/e2b-dev/mcp-servergithub.com/xiaojiou176-open/openvibecoding
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

E2B

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Giving Claude ability to run code with E2B via MCP (Model Context Protocol).

OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read-only MCP for OpenVibeCoding runs, workflows, proof, queue, replay, and incident reads.

How to run each

E2B As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "E2B_API_KEY=<YOUR_E2B_API_KEY>" --transport stdio e2b -- docker run -i --rm -e E2B_API_KEY mcp/e2b

Requires: E2B_API_KEY (secret)

OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio openvibecoding-readonly -- uvx openvibecoding-orchestrator

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: E2B · What it can do: OpenVibeCoding Read-only MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built