Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Firecrawl vs notolens

Firecrawl is an MCP server published by firecrawl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). notolens is an MCP server published by notolens.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceFirecrawlnotolens
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:28e677a10704
Forks (GitHub): 921
Pulls (Docker Hub): 139 852
Stars (Docker Hub): 20
Stars (GitHub): 7 629
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.22.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Firecrawl vs notolens
FactFirecrawlnotolens
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)7 629No figure on GitHub
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)139 852No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)921No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-18
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/firecrawl)Remote server (notolens.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)26Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)8, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/mendableai/firecrawl-mcp-serverNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)010
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 36 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Firecrawl

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.

notolens

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Brand protection: monitor domains, trademarks and app stores. Triage matches and track takedowns.

How to run each

Firecrawl As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FIRECRAWL_API_KEY=<YOUR_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY>" --transport stdio firecrawl -- docker run -i --rm -e FIRECRAWL_API_KEY mcp/firecrawl

Requires: FIRECRAWL_API_KEY (secret)

notolens As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http notolens https://notolens.com/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only notolens has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of notolens publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of notolens publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Firecrawl · What it can do: notolens · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built