Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Firecrawl vs That SEO Agent

Firecrawl is an MCP server published by firecrawl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). That SEO Agent is an MCP server published by thatseoagent.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceFirecrawlThat SEO Agent
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:28e677a10704
Forks (GitHub): 910
Pulls (Docker Hub): 139 262
Stars (Docker Hub): 20
Stars (GitHub): 7 610
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.5.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Firecrawl vs That SEO Agent
FactFirecrawlThat SEO Agent
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)7 610 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)139 262No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)910 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/firecrawl)Remote server (thatseoagent.com/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)26Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)8, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/mendableai/firecrawl-mcp-servergithub.com/thatseoagent/skills
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 9 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Firecrawl

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.

That SEO Agent

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

SEO analysis for sites you own: Google Search Console, GA4, PageSpeed, and full site audits.

How to run each

Firecrawl As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FIRECRAWL_API_KEY=<YOUR_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY>" --transport stdio firecrawl -- docker run -i --rm -e FIRECRAWL_API_KEY mcp/firecrawl

Requires: FIRECRAWL_API_KEY (secret)

That SEO Agent As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http seo https://thatseoagent.com/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only That SEO Agent has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of That SEO Agent publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of That SEO Agent publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Firecrawl · What it can do: That SEO Agent · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built