Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Firecrawl vs Odysseus Web MCP

Firecrawl is an MCP server published by firecrawl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Odysseus Web MCP is an MCP server published by AceAtDev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceFirecrawlOdysseus Web MCP
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:28e677a10704
Forks (GitHub): 910
Pulls (Docker Hub): 139 053
Stars (Docker Hub): 20
Stars (GitHub): 7 610
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Firecrawl vs Odysseus Web MCP
FactFirecrawlOdysseus Web MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)7 610 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)139 053No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)910 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/firecrawl)On your machine (https://github.com/AceAtDev/odysseus-web-mcp/releases/download/v0.1.0/odysseus-web-mcp.mcpb)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)26Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)8, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/mendableai/firecrawl-mcp-servergithub.com/aceatdev/odysseus-web-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Firecrawl

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.

Odysseus Web MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Secure MCP server for public web search and URL fetching.

How to run each

Firecrawl As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FIRECRAWL_API_KEY=<YOUR_FIRECRAWL_API_KEY>" --transport stdio firecrawl -- docker run -i --rm -e FIRECRAWL_API_KEY mcp/firecrawl

Requires: FIRECRAWL_API_KEY (secret)

Odysseus Web MCP

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Odysseus Web MCP publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Odysseus Web MCP publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Firecrawl · What it can do: Odysseus Web MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built