Comparison

Firewalla vs Abuseipdb

Firewalla is an MCP server published by amittell. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Abuseipdb is an MCP server published by pipeworx-io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-24. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplace	Firewalla	Abuseipdb
Docker MCP Catalog	Listed Version: sha256:af186f868759 Forks (GitHub): 13 Pulls (Docker Hub): 31 051 Stars (Docker Hub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 39 Not marked · First seen 2026-10-11	Not listed
Official MCP Registry	Not listed	Listed Version: 0.1.4 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen 2026-10-11

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Firewalla vs Abuseipdb
Fact	Firewalla	Abuseipdb
Marketplaces that list it	1	1
Stars (GitHub) (differs)	39 (better)	0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)	31 051	No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)	13 (better)	0 (worse)
Last release (differs)	Not published	2026-10-22
Where it runs (differs)	On your machine (mcp/firewalla-mcp-server)	Remote server (gateway.pipeworx.io/abuseipdb/mcp)
Transport (differs)	stdio	Streamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)	28	Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)	12, secrets among them: 1	Not published
Licence (differs)	MIT	Not stated
Repository (differs)	github.com/amittell/firewalla-mcp-server	github.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-abuseipdb
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)	0	2
First seen	2026-10-11	2026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)	no remote endpoint we check	Responded 2 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Firewalla

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Real-time network monitoring, security analysis, and firewall management through 28 specialized tools. Access security alerts, network flows, device status, and firewall rules directly from your Firewalla device.

Abuseipdb

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

AbuseIPDB MCP — wraps AbuseIPDB v2 API (api.abuseipdb.com/api/v2)

How to run each

Firewalla As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code

claude mcp add --env "FIREWALLA_MSP_TOKEN=<YOUR_FIREWALLA_MSP_TOKEN>" --transport stdio firewalla-mcp-server -- docker run -i --rm -e FIREWALLA_MSP_TOKEN mcp/firewalla-mcp-server

Requires: FIREWALLA_MSP_TOKEN (secret)

Abuseipdb As a remote MCP server

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http abuseipdb https://gateway.pipeworx.io/abuseipdb/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Abuseipdb has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Only Firewalla has

create_target_list
delete_target_list
get_active_alarms
get_alarm_trends
get_bandwidth_usage
get_boxes
get_device_status
get_flow_data
get_flow_insights
get_network_rules
get_network_rules_summary
get_offline_devices

Show the remaining 16

get_recent_flow_activity
get_rule_trends
get_simple_statistics
get_specific_alarm
get_specific_target_list
get_statistics_by_box
get_statistics_by_region
get_target_lists
pause_rule
resume_rule
search_alarms
search_devices
search_flows
search_rules
search_target_lists
update_target_list

Only Abuseipdb has

ai_visibility_check
archive_compare
archive_evidence
ask_pipeworx
ask_pipeworx_beta
ask_pipeworx_grounded
bet_research
check_ip
classify_row
company_facts
company_register_search
compare_entities

Show the remaining 33

deep_research
discover_tools
entity_profile
forget
generate_llms_txt
get_blacklist
kalshi_weather_edge
list_subscriptions
pipeworx_feedback
pipeworx_trending
polymarket_arbitrage
polymarket_edge_tracker
polymarket_edges
polymarket_fill_risk
polymarket_kalshi_spread
prediction_calibration
recall
recent_alerts
recent_changes
release_calendar_markets
remember
report_ip
research_row
resolution_audit
resolution_diff
resolve_entity
scan_competitor_ai_presence
scan_dependency
search_within
subscribe
suggest_questions
unsubscribe
validate_claim

Both have

None

Tool names as the marketplaces declare them and as Ext Ops observed them on the endpoints (Abuseipdb as of 2026-10-24). More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Abuseipdb publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Firewalla · What it can do: Abuseipdb · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on 2026-10-24. We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.