Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Git (Reference) vs pr-review

Git (Reference) is an MCP server published by modelcontextprotocol. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). pr-review is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Community. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceGit (Reference)pr-review
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:ad6af958e794
Forks (GitHub): 11 793
Pulls (Docker Hub): 172 391
Stars (Docker Hub): 30
Stars (GitHub): 91 324
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Community marketplace composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 661
Stars (GitHub): 1 949
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Git (Reference) vs pr-review
FactGit (Reference)pr-review
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)91 324 (better)1 949 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)172 391No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)11 793 (better)661 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/git)Installs as a plugin bundle
Transport (differs)stdioNot stated
Tools it declares (differs)12Not published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)Not a bundle1
Licence (differs)NOASSERTIONNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/modelcontextprotocol/serversgithub.com/composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-15

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Git (Reference)

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Git repository interaction and automation.

pr-review

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Comprehensive PR reviews with detailed feedback

How to run each

Git (Reference) As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio git -- docker run -i --rm mcp/git

pr-review As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins
/plugin install pr-review@awesome-claude-plugins

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of pr-review publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Git (Reference) · What it can do: pr-review · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built