Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

GitMCP vs competitors-analysis

GitMCP is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). competitors-analysis is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by daymade. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceGitMCPcompetitors-analysis
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Community marketplace daymade/claude-code-skills Not listed Listed
Version: 1.6.4
Forks (GitHub): 226
Stars (GitHub): 1 470
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

GitMCP vs competitors-analysis
FactGitMCPcompetitors-analysis
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1 470
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub226
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (gitmcp.io/docs)Installs as a plugin bundle
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPNot stated
Tools it declares (differs)5Not published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/daymade/claude-code-skills
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-15
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 2 days agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

GitMCP

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Tools for interacting with Git repositories.

competitors-analysis

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Discover, clone, update, and analyze competitor repositories with evidence-based competitive intelligence. Use when tracking competitors, reviewing competitor source code, adding a competitor repository, comparing product capabilities, building a competitor landscape, checking latest competitor code, or when the user says 竞品分析, competitor scan, analyze competitor, or compare with X. Repository-backed findings must come from local cloned code with file:line citations; market-landscape claims must cite their source and volatility.

How to run each

GitMCP As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http gitmcp https://gitmcp.io/docs

competitors-analysis As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add daymade/claude-code-skills
/plugin install competitors-analysis@daymade-skills

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only GitMCP has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of competitors-analysis publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: GitMCP · What it can do: competitors-analysis · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built