Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

HubSpot vs Clockify Time Tracking

HubSpot is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Clockify Time Tracking is an MCP server published by tracegazer. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceHubSpotClockify Time Tracking
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.3.2
Downloads/month (PyPI): 158
Downloads/week (PyPI): 63
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

HubSpot vs Clockify Time Tracking
FactHubSpotClockify Time Tracking
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (app.hubspot.com/mcp/v1/http)On your machine (clockify-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 13, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/tracegazer/clockify-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)not checked yetno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

HubSpot

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Unite marketing, sales, and customer service with AI-powered automation, lead management, and comprehensive analytics.

Clockify Time Tracking

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Clockify time-tracking MCP: 112 tools across 18 domains, read-only by default with opt-in writes.

How to run each

HubSpot As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http hubspot https://app.hubspot.com/mcp/v1/http

Requires: HUBSPOT_API_KEY (secret)

Clockify Time Tracking As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "CLOCKIFY_API_KEY=<YOUR_CLOCKIFY_API_KEY>" --transport stdio clockify-mcp -- uvx clockify-mcp

Requires: CLOCKIFY_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only HubSpot asks for

  • HUBSPOT_API_KEY (secret)

Only Clockify Time Tracking asks for

  • CLOCKIFY_ACCESS_MODE
  • CLOCKIFY_API_KEY (secret)
  • CLOCKIFY_DEFAULT_WORKSPACE_ID

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: HubSpot · What it can do: Clockify Time Tracking · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built