Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Hyperbrowser vs 6Frame Verify

Hyperbrowser is an MCP server published by hyperbrowserai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). 6Frame Verify is an MCP server published by bret1976. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceHyperbrowser6Frame Verify
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:11ed80138c33
Forks (GitHub): 75
Pulls (Docker Hub): 41 160
Stars (Docker Hub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 789
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.3.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Hyperbrowser vs 6Frame Verify
FactHyperbrowser6Frame Verify
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)789 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)41 160No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)75 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-12
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/hyperbrowser)Remote server (siteverify.dev/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)10Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/hyperbrowserai/mcpgithub.com/bret1976/6frame-verify
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)04
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checknot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Hyperbrowser

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

A MCP server implementation for hyperbrowser.

6Frame Verify

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Pre-launch website QA in 60s via real Chromium. $3/check; agents can pay in USDC (x402).

How to run each

Hyperbrowser As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY=<YOUR_HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY>" --transport stdio hyperbrowser -- docker run -i --rm -e HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY mcp/hyperbrowser

Requires: HYPERBROWSER_API_KEY (secret)

6Frame Verify As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http 6frame-verify https://siteverify.dev/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of 6Frame Verify publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of 6Frame Verify publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Hyperbrowser · What it can do: 6Frame Verify · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built