Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Iaptic vs CricketStudio MCP

Iaptic is an MCP server published by iaptic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). CricketStudio MCP is an MCP server published by i-m-arul. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-25. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceIapticCricketStudio MCP
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:7f86e3becb71
Forks (GitHub): 6
Pulls (Docker Hub): 16 585
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 9
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.2
Downloads/month (npm): 277
Downloads/week (npm): 54
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Iaptic vs CricketStudio MCP
FactIapticCricketStudio MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)9 (better)2 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)16 585No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)6 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/iaptic)On your machine (cricketstudio-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)17Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 12, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/iaptic/mcp-server-iapticgithub.com/i-m-arul/cricketstudio-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Iaptic

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Model Context Protocol server for interacting with iaptic.

CricketStudio MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

29 MCP tools for IPL 2026, IPL historical (18 seasons), and Major League Cricket. No API key.

How to run each

Iaptic As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "IAPTIC_API_KEY=<YOUR_IAPTIC_API_KEY>" --transport stdio iaptic -- docker run -i --rm -e IAPTIC_API_KEY mcp/iaptic

Requires: IAPTIC_API_KEY (secret)

CricketStudio MCP As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio cricketstudio-mcp -- npx -y cricketstudio-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of CricketStudio MCP publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only Iaptic asks for

  • IAPTIC_API_KEY (secret)
  • IAPTIC_APP_NAME

Only CricketStudio MCP asks for

  • CRICKETSTUDIO_DEV_ID
  • CRICKETSTUDIO_NO_TELEMETRY

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Iaptic · What it can do: CricketStudio MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built