Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Iaptic vs GestãoClick

Iaptic is an MCP server published by iaptic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). GestãoClick is an MCP server published by mcp-dir. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceIapticGestãoClick
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:7f86e3becb71
Forks (GitHub): 6
Pulls (Docker Hub): 16 391
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 9
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 (last published figure)
Stars (GitHub): 1 (last published figure)
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Iaptic vs GestãoClick
FactIapticGestãoClick
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)91 (last published figure)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)16 391No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)61 (last published figure)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/iaptic)Remote server (api.mcp.ai/p_gestaoclick)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)17Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/iaptic/mcp-server-iapticgithub.com/mcp-dir/gestaoclick-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 17 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Iaptic

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Model Context Protocol server for interacting with iaptic.

GestãoClick

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

GestãoClick ERP (business management for SMBs) via the official API: customers, suppliers, products

How to run each

Iaptic As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "IAPTIC_API_KEY=<YOUR_IAPTIC_API_KEY>" --transport stdio iaptic -- docker run -i --rm -e IAPTIC_API_KEY mcp/iaptic

Requires: IAPTIC_API_KEY (secret)

GestãoClick As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http gestaoclick-mcp https://api.mcp.ai/p_gestaoclick

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only GestãoClick has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of GestãoClick publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of GestãoClick publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Iaptic · What it can do: GestãoClick · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built