Kagi Search vs AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识）
Kagi Search is an MCP server published by kagisearch. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） is an MCP server published by Wh-bi. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-22. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  Kagi Search |  AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） |
|---|---|---|
| Docker MCP Catalog | Listed Version: sha256:c26439346cd6 Forks (GitHub): 49 Pulls (Docker Hub): 19 949 Stars (Docker Hub): 1 Stars (GitHub): 546 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 1.1.3 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Kagi Search | AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 546 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs) | 19 949 | No figure on Docker Hub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 49 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Last release (differs) | Not published | 2026-10-13 |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (mcp/kagisearch) | Remote server (mcp.wanhetools.top/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares (differs) | 2 | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 2, secrets among them: 1 | Not published |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/kagisearch/kagimcp | github.com/wh-bi/wanhe-compliance-mcp |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Not responding since 2026-10-21 |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Kagi Search
The Official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Kagi Search & other tools.
AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识）
中文内容合规检查：广告法违禁词 + AI 标识规则，逐条给出法条依据。Chinese content compliance: ad-law banned terms + AI labeling.
How to run each
Kagi Search As a local MCP server: Docker image
claude mcp add --env "KAGI_API_KEY=<YOUR_KAGI_API_KEY>" --transport stdio kagisearch -- docker run -i --rm -e KAGI_API_KEY mcp/kagisearchRequires: KAGI_API_KEY (secret)
AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http wanhe-compliance https://mcp.wanhetools.top/mcpCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Only Kagi Search has
kagi_search_fetchkagi_summarizer
Only AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） has
check_ai_labelcheck_content
Both have
None
Tool names as the marketplaces declare them and as Ext Ops observed them on the endpoints (AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） as of 2026-10-15). More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: Kagi Search · What it can do: AI 内容合规检查（广告法违禁词 + AI 标识） · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.