Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Kong Konnect vs keygrant

Kong Konnect is an MCP server published by Kong. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). keygrant is an MCP server published by bazingaedward. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceKong Konnectkeygrant
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:7988d6e1b0bf
Forks (GitHub): 17
Pulls (Docker Hub): 19 570
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 45
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.9
Downloads/month (PyPI): 0
Downloads/week (PyPI): 757
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Kong Konnect vs keygrant
FactKong Konnectkeygrant
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)45 (better)1 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)19 570No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)17 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-17
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/kong)On your machine (keygrant)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)10Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Repository (differs)github.com/kong/mcp-konnectgithub.com/bazingaedward/keygrant
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)03
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Kong Konnect

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with Kong Konnect APIs, allowing AI assistants to query and analyze Kong Gateway configurations, traffic, and analytics.

keygrant

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Run commands with API keys injected per call — values never enter model context.

How to run each

Kong Konnect As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "KONNECT_ACCESS_TOKEN=<YOUR_KONNECT_ACCESS_TOKEN>" --transport stdio kong -- docker run -i --rm -e KONNECT_ACCESS_TOKEN mcp/kong

Requires: KONNECT_ACCESS_TOKEN (secret)

keygrant As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio keygrant -- uvx keygrant mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of keygrant publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of keygrant publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Kong Konnect · What it can do: keygrant · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built