Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Markitdown vs Glif

Markitdown is an MCP server published by microsoft. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Glif is an MCP server published by glif.app. Marketplaces we read that list it: 3 (Official MCP Registry, Docker MCP Catalog, Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceMarkitdownGlif
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:9cb5f26d30b6
Forks (GitHub): 14 135
Pulls (Docker Hub): 158 529
Stars (Docker Hub): 5
Stars (GitHub): 190 251
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: sha256:3f93ddceeb99
Forks (GitHub): 33
Pulls (Docker Hub): 19 662
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 214
Not marked · First seen
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 33
Stars (GitHub): 214
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Markitdown vs Glif
FactMarkitdownGlif
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)3 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)190 251 (better)214 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)158 529 (better)19 662 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)14 135 (better)33 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/markitdown)Remote server or your machine
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP, stdio
Tools it declares (differs)110
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published3, secrets among them: 1
Parts of the bundle (differs)Not a bundle11
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/microsoft/markitdowngithub.com/glifxyz/glif-mcp-server
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checknot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Markitdown

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

A lightweight MCP server for calling MarkItDown.

Glif

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Generate images, video, and audio with Glif's media-generation agent

How to run each

Markitdown As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio markitdown -- docker run -i --rm mcp/markitdown

Glif As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http glif https://glif.app/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Only Markitdown declares

  • convert_to_markdown

Only Glif declares

  • glif_info
  • list_featured_glifs
  • list_saved_glif_tools
  • my_glif_user_info
  • my_glifs
  • remove_all_glif_tools
  • remove_glif_tool
  • run_glif
  • save_glif_as_tool
  • search_glifs

Both declare

None

Tool names as each marketplace publishes them. More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Markitdown publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Markitdown · What it can do: Glif · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built