Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Python Refactoring Assistant vs SonarQube MCP Server

Python Refactoring Assistant is an MCP server published by slamer59. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). SonarQube MCP Server is an MCP server published by SonarSource. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Docker MCP Catalog). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacePython Refactoring AssistantSonarQube MCP Server
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:4cd4303da424
Forks (GitHub): 6
Pulls (Docker Hub): 36 917
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 13
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: sha256:925c88bc7cab
Forks (GitHub): 103
Pulls (Docker Hub): 1 509 353
Stars (Docker Hub): 23
Stars (GitHub): 664
Not marked · First seen
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.21.0
Forks (GitHub): 103
Stars (GitHub): 664
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Python Refactoring Assistant vs SonarQube MCP Server
FactPython Refactoring AssistantSonarQube MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)13 (worse)664 (better)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)36 917 (worse)1 509 353 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)6 (worse)103 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/mcp-python-refactoring)On your machine (docker.io/sonarsource/sonarqube-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)925
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published3, secrets among them: 3
Licence (differs)MITNOASSERTION
Repository (differs)github.com/slamer59/mcp-python-refactoringgithub.com/sonarsource/sonarqube-mcp-server
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Python Refactoring Assistant

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Educational Python refactoring assistant that provides guided suggestions for AI assistants.

SonarQube MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Analyze code quality and security with SonarQube Server or Cloud directly in AI assistants.

How to run each

Python Refactoring Assistant As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio mcp-python-refactoring -- docker run -i --rm mcp/mcp-python-refactoring

SonarQube MCP Server As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "SONARQUBE_ORG=<YOUR_SONARQUBE_ORG>" --env "SONARQUBE_TOKEN=<YOUR_SONARQUBE_TOKEN>" --env "SONARQUBE_URL=<YOUR_SONARQUBE_URL>" --transport stdio sonarqube-mcp-server -- docker run -i --rm -e SONARQUBE_ORG -e SONARQUBE_TOKEN -e SONARQUBE_URL docker.io/sonarsource/sonarqube-mcp

Requires: SONARQUBE_ORG (secret), SONARQUBE_TOKEN (secret), SONARQUBE_URL (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Only Python Refactoring Assistant declares

  • analyze_python_file
  • analyze_python_package
  • analyze_security_and_patterns
  • analyze_test_coverage
  • find_long_functions
  • find_package_issues
  • get_extraction_guidance
  • get_package_metrics
  • tdd_refactoring_guidance

Only SonarQube MCP Server declares

  • analyze_code_snippet
  • analyze_file_list
  • change_sonar_issue_status
  • create_webhook
  • get_component_measures
  • get_project_quality_gate_status
  • get_raw_source
  • get_scm_info
  • get_system_health
  • get_system_info
  • get_system_logs
  • get_system_status
Show the remaining 13
  • list_enterprises
  • list_languages
  • list_portfolios
  • list_quality_gates
  • list_rule_repositories
  • list_webhooks
  • ping_system
  • search_dependency_risks
  • search_metrics
  • search_my_sonarqube_projects
  • search_sonar_issues_in_projects
  • show_rule
  • toggle_automatic_analysis

Both declare

None

Tool names as each marketplace publishes them. More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Python Refactoring Assistant publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Python Refactoring Assistant · What it can do: SonarQube MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built