Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Neo4j Cloud Aura Api vs PlanetScale

Neo4j Cloud Aura Api is an MCP server published by neo4j-contrib. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). PlanetScale is an MCP server published by planetscale. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceNeo4j Cloud Aura ApiPlanetScale
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:c3db64e4e2bc
Forks (GitHub): 262
Pulls (Docker Hub): 16 273
Stars (Docker Hub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 988
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 5
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Neo4j Cloud Aura Api vs PlanetScale
FactNeo4j Cloud Aura ApiPlanetScale
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)988 (better)5 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)16 273No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)262 (better)4 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/neo4j-cloud-aura-api)Remote server (mcp.pscale.dev/mcp/planetscale)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)12Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)8, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4jgithub.com/planetscale/mcp-server
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 2 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Neo4j Cloud Aura Api

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Manage Neo4j Aura database instances through the Neo4j Aura API.

PlanetScale

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Connect to PlanetScale databases, branches, schema, query insights, and execute SQL

How to run each

Neo4j Cloud Aura Api As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "NEO4J_AURA_CLIENT_SECRET=<YOUR_NEO4J_AURA_CLIENT_SECRET>" --transport stdio neo4j-cloud-aura-api -- docker run -i --rm -e NEO4J_AURA_CLIENT_SECRET mcp/neo4j-cloud-aura-api

Requires: NEO4J_AURA_CLIENT_SECRET (secret)

PlanetScale As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http planetscale https://mcp.pscale.dev/mcp/planetscale

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only PlanetScale has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of PlanetScale publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of PlanetScale publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Neo4j Cloud Aura Api · What it can do: PlanetScale · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built