Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

OpenMesh vs @capxul/mcp

OpenMesh is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). @capxul/mcp is an MCP server published by @capxul. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (npm registry (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-07. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpenMesh@capxul/mcp
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
npm registry (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 4.20.0-beta.42
Downloads/month (npm): 6 531
Downloads/week (npm): 593
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

OpenMesh vs @capxul/mcp
FactOpenMesh@capxul/mcp
Marketplaces that list it11
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-18
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.openmesh.dev/mcp)On your machine (@capxul/mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPNot stated
Tools it declares (differs)4Not published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0UNLICENSED
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/xelmar-tech/infrastructure
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-12
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Status out of date: no HTTP response at the last check 38 h agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

OpenMesh

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Discover and connect to a curated marketplace of MCP servers for extending AI agent capabilities.

@capxul/mcp

In its own words, on npm registry (MCP servers):

Capxul MCP server for auth, Account readiness, identity, Organizations, relationships, requests, destinations, and testnet funding over Streamable HTTP.

How to run each

OpenMesh As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http openmesh https://api.openmesh.dev/mcp

@capxul/mcp

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only OpenMesh has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of @capxul/mcp publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: OpenMesh · What it can do: @capxul/mcp · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Package data comes from the public npm registry (registry.npmjs.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built