Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

OpenMesh vs madeira.fun Hiking Permits

OpenMesh is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). madeira.fun Hiking Permits is an MCP server published by madeira.fun. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpenMeshmadeira.fun Hiking Permits
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.2.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

OpenMesh vs madeira.fun Hiking Permits
FactOpenMeshmadeira.fun Hiking Permits
Marketplaces that list it11
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-23
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.openmesh.dev/mcp)Remote server (madeira.fun/api/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)4Not published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
RepositoryNot statedNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-21
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Status out of date: no HTTP response at the last check 2 days agoResponded 23 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

OpenMesh

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Discover and connect to a curated marketplace of MCP servers for extending AI agent capabilities.

madeira.fun Hiking Permits

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Madeira hiking permit trails: availability for 120 days, fees, booking links and reservations.

How to run each

OpenMesh As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http openmesh https://api.openmesh.dev/mcp

madeira.fun Hiking Permits As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http hiking-permits https://madeira.fun/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only the endpoint of madeira.fun Hiking Permits responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Only OpenMesh has

  • call_service
  • discover_service
  • get_alternative
  • report_experience

Only madeira.fun Hiking Permits has

  • build_booking_link
  • check_trail_availability
  • confirm_reservation
  • get_permit_fees
  • get_reservation_status
  • get_start_times
  • list_permit_trails
  • start_reservation

Both have

None

Tool names as the marketplaces declare them and as Ext Ops observed them on the endpoints (madeira.fun Hiking Permits as of 2026-11-01). More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: OpenMesh · What it can do: madeira.fun Hiking Permits · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built