Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts vs Veriql Risk

OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Veriql Risk is an MCP server published by veriql.app. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-08. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpenZeppelin Stellar ContractsVeriql Risk
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Downloads/month (npm): 1 052
Downloads/week (npm): 374
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts vs Veriql Risk
FactOpenZeppelin Stellar ContractsVeriql Risk
Marketplaces that list it11
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-31
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.openzeppelin.com/contracts/stellar/mcp)On your machine (veriql-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declares (differs)6Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published2, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
RepositoryNot statedNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 12 h agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Access to OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts.

Veriql Risk

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Rug, honeypot and wallet-approval risk checks on Solana and EVM, with every penalty driver shown.

How to run each

OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http openzeppelin-stellar https://mcp.openzeppelin.com/contracts/stellar/mcp

Veriql Risk As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "VERIQL_API_KEY=<YOUR_VERIQL_API_KEY>" --transport stdio veriql-mcp -- npx -y veriql-mcp

Requires: VERIQL_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Veriql Risk publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts · What it can do: Veriql Risk · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built