Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts vs PayPerScreen

OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). PayPerScreen is an MCP server published by TonytheTiger22. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpenZeppelin Stylus ContractsPayPerScreen
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts vs PayPerScreen
FactOpenZeppelin Stylus ContractsPayPerScreen
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-14
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.openzeppelin.com/contracts/stylus/mcp)On your machine (payperscreen-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declares (differs)3Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published3, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/tonythetiger22/payperscreen
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)03
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-14
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 31 h agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Access to OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts.

PayPerScreen

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Sanctions, crypto wallet, email and IP screening for agents. Pay per check in USDC via x402.

How to run each

OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http openzeppelin-stylus https://mcp.openzeppelin.com/contracts/stylus/mcp

PayPerScreen As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "PAYPERSCREEN_PRIVATE_KEY=<YOUR_PAYPERSCREEN_PRIVATE_KEY>" --transport stdio payperscreen -- npx -y payperscreen-mcp

Requires: PAYPERSCREEN_PRIVATE_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of PayPerScreen publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: OpenZeppelin Stylus Contracts · What it can do: PayPerScreen · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built