Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Paper Search vs Lacuna Research MCP

Paper Search is an MCP server published by openags. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Lacuna Research MCP is an MCP server published by tiptreesystems. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, PyPI (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-30. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacePaper SearchLacuna Research MCP
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:19d0af269a55
Forks (GitHub): 304
Pulls (Docker Hub): 46 104
Stars (Docker Hub): 5
Stars (GitHub): 2 950
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.6.7
Downloads/month (PyPI): 820
Downloads/week (PyPI): 2 766
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 8
Not marked · First seen
PyPI (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 0.6.7
Downloads/month (PyPI): 820
Downloads/week (PyPI): 2 766
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 8
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Paper Search vs Lacuna Research MCP
FactPaper SearchLacuna Research MCP
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 950 (better)8 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)46 104No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)304 (better)1 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-23
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/paper-search)Remote server or your machine
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)57Not published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/openags/paper-search-mcpgithub.com/tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 5 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Paper Search

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

MCP, CLI, Skills for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple sources like arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, etc.

Lacuna Research MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.

How to run each

Paper Search As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio paper-search -- docker run -i --rm mcp/paper-search

Lacuna Research MCP As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http lacuna-research-mcp https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Lacuna Research MCP has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Only Paper Search has

  • download_arxiv
  • download_base
  • download_biorxiv
  • download_citeseerx
  • download_crossref
  • download_dblp
  • download_doaj
  • download_hal
  • download_iacr
  • download_medrxiv
  • download_openaire
  • download_openalex
Show the remaining 45
  • download_pubmed
  • download_scihub
  • download_semantic
  • download_ssrn
  • download_with_fallback
  • download_zenodo
  • get_crossref_paper_by_doi
  • read_arxiv_paper
  • read_base_paper
  • read_biorxiv_paper
  • read_citeseerx_paper
  • read_crossref_paper
  • read_dblp_paper
  • read_doaj_paper
  • read_hal_paper
  • read_iacr_paper
  • read_medrxiv_paper
  • read_openaire_paper
  • read_openalex_paper
  • read_pubmed_paper
  • read_semantic_paper
  • read_ssrn_paper
  • read_zenodo_paper
  • search_arxiv
  • search_base
  • search_biorxiv
  • search_citeseerx
  • search_core
  • search_crossref
  • search_dblp
  • search_doaj
  • search_europepmc
  • search_google_scholar
  • search_hal
  • search_iacr
  • search_medrxiv
  • search_openaire
  • search_openalex
  • search_papers
  • search_pmc
  • search_pubmed
  • search_semantic
  • search_ssrn
  • search_unpaywall
  • search_zenodo

Only Lacuna Research MCP has

  • get_author_context
  • get_author_directions
  • get_author_neighbors
  • get_author_papers
  • get_direction
  • get_direction_papers
  • get_hypothesis
  • get_institution_authors
  • get_institution_context
  • get_paper
  • get_resource
  • get_venue_context
Show the remaining 1
  • search_lacuna

Both have

None

Tool names as the marketplaces declare them and as Ext Ops observed them on the endpoints (Lacuna Research MCP as of 2026-10-22). More tools is not better in itself: compare what each needs for the job.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Paper Search · What it can do: Lacuna Research MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built