Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

QuantConnect vs ETF Research

QuantConnect is an MCP server published by QuantConnect. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). ETF Research is an MCP server published by myanptl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-21. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceQuantConnectETF Research
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:f96cc99e83a0
Forks (GitHub): 32
Pulls (Docker Hub): 36 250
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 79
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.3.1
Downloads/month (npm): 519
Downloads/week (npm): 25
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

QuantConnect vs ETF Research
FactQuantConnectETF Research
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)79 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)36 250No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)32 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/quantconnect)On your machine (etf-research-mcp)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)64Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)3, secrets among them: 01, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/quantconnect/mcp-servergithub.com/myanptl/etf-research-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

QuantConnect

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

The QuantConnect MCP Server is a bridge for AIs (such as Claude and OpenAI o3 Pro) to interact with our cloud platform. When equipped with our MCP, the AI can perform tasks on your behalf through our API such as updating projects, writing strategies, backtesting, and deploying strategies to production live-trading.

ETF Research

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

ETF quotes, performance and comparisons, plus every holding and fund overlap from SEC N-PORT.

How to run each

QuantConnect As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio quantconnect -- docker run -i --rm mcp/quantconnect

ETF Research As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio etf-research-mcp -- npx -y etf-research-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of ETF Research publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only QuantConnect asks for

  • AGENT_NAME
  • QUANTCONNECT_API_TOKEN
  • QUANTCONNECT_USER_ID

Only ETF Research asks for

  • SEC_USER_AGENT

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: QuantConnect · What it can do: ETF Research · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built