Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Resend vs Outlook Contacts

Resend is an MCP server published by resend. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Outlook Contacts is an MCP server published by pipeworx-io. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceResendOutlook Contacts
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:2a786579214e
Forks (GitHub): 91
Pulls (Docker Hub): 22 208
Stars (Docker Hub): 5
Stars (GitHub): 577
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.3
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Resend vs Outlook Contacts
FactResendOutlook Contacts
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)577 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)22 208No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)91 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/resend)Remote server (gateway.pipeworx.io/outlook-contacts/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)3, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/resend/mcp-send-emailgithub.com/pipeworx-io/mcp-outlook-contacts
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkAnswered with HTTP 404 (6 days ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Resend

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

The official MCP server to send emails and interact with Resend.

Outlook Contacts

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Outlook Contacts (Microsoft 365) MCP Pack

How to run each

Resend As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "RESEND_API_KEY=<YOUR_RESEND_API_KEY>" --transport stdio resend -- docker run -i --rm -e RESEND_API_KEY mcp/resend

Requires: RESEND_API_KEY (secret)

Outlook Contacts As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http outlook-contacts https://gateway.pipeworx.io/outlook-contacts/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Outlook Contacts has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Outlook Contacts publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Outlook Contacts publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Resend · What it can do: Outlook Contacts · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built