Rube vs SSH MCP Tool
Rube is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). SSH MCP Tool is an MCP server published by oaslananka. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace | ||
|---|---|---|
| Docker MCP Catalog | Listed Version: not stated No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 2.2.7 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Rube | SSH MCP Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | Remote server (rube.app/mcp) | On your machine (mcp-ssh-tool) |
| Transport (differs) | Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 1, secrets among them: 1 | 4, secrets among them: 1 |
| Licence (differs) | Apache-2.0 | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | Not stated | github.com/oaslananka-lab/mcp-ssh-tool |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | Not responding since 2026-10-14 | no remote endpoint we check |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Rube
Access to Rube's catalog of remote MCP servers.
SSH MCP Tool
Secure MCP SSH automation server with policy controls, resources, prompts, stdio, and HTTP.
How to run each
Rube As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http rube https://rube.app/mcpRequires: RUBE_API_KEY (secret)
SSH MCP Tool As a local MCP server: npm package
claude mcp add --env "SSH_MCP_HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN_FILE=<YOUR_SSH_MCP_HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN_FILE>" --transport stdio mcp-ssh-tool -- npx -y mcp-ssh-toolRequires: SSH_MCP_HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN_FILE (secret)
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only Rube has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
Only Rube asks for
RUBE_API_KEY (secret)
Only SSH MCP Tool asks for
SSH_MCP_HTTP_ALLOWED_ORIGINSSSH_MCP_HTTP_BEARER_TOKEN_FILE (secret)SSH_MCP_HTTP_PUBLIC_URLSSH_MCP_HTTP_TRUST_PROXY
Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.
What it can do: Rube · What it can do: SSH MCP Tool · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.