Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Schogini Image Border vs ImageKit

Schogini Image Border is an MCP server published by schogini. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). ImageKit is an MCP server published by OlsOls4. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceSchogini Image BorderImageKit
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:aadb75058ed1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Pulls (Docker Hub): 35 958
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Schogini Image Border vs ImageKit
FactSchogini Image BorderImageKit
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub)00
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)35 958No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/schogini_mcp_image_border)Remote server (imagekit-resize-convert-to-webp-compress-crop.p.rapidapi.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)3Not published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/schogini/schogini_mcp_image_bordergithub.com/olsols4/webkit-api
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-14
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checknot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Schogini Image Border

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

This adds a border to an image and returns base64 encoded image.

ImageKit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Resize, convert to WebP, compress, crop, rotate and strip EXIF from images

How to run each

Schogini Image Border As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio schogini-mcp-image-border -- docker run -i --rm mcp/schogini_mcp_image_border

ImageKit As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http imagekit https://imagekit-resize-convert-to-webp-compress-crop.p.rapidapi.com/mcp --header "X-RapidAPI-Key: <YOUR_X_RAPIDAPI_KEY>" --header "X-RapidAPI-Host: <YOUR_X_RAPIDAPI_HOST>"

Requires: X-RapidAPI-Key header, X-RapidAPI-Host header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of ImageKit publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Schogini Image Border · What it can do: ImageKit · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built