Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Scrapezy vs Fitter

Scrapezy is an MCP server published by Scrapezy. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Fitter is an MCP server published by PxyUp. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. Each is among the other's three closest plugins by what they say they do, both are of the same kind, and both are known: listed on a curated marketplace or on several, or with a figure of note.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceScrapezyFitter
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:7a19e9b36500
Forks (GitHub): 7
Pulls (Docker Hub): 40 870
Stars (Docker Hub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 14
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.8.3
Forks (GitHub): 10
Stars (GitHub): 133
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Scrapezy vs Fitter
FactScrapezyFitter
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)14 (worse)133 (better)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)40 870No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)7 (worse)10 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/scrapezy)On your machine (https://github.com/PxyUp/fitter/releases/download/v1.8.3/fitter-mcp-darwin-arm64.mcpb)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 11, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/scrapezy/mcpgithub.com/pxyup/fitter
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Scrapezy

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

A Model Context Protocol server for Scrapezy that enables AI models to extract structured data from websites.

Fitter

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Turn any website or API into structured JSON with LLM-authored declarative scraping configs.

How to run each

Scrapezy As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "SCRAPEZY_API_KEY=<YOUR_SCRAPEZY_API_KEY>" --transport stdio scrapezy -- docker run -i --rm -e SCRAPEZY_API_KEY mcp/scrapezy

Requires: SCRAPEZY_API_KEY (secret)

Fitter

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Fitter publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only Scrapezy asks for

  • SCRAPEZY_API_KEY (secret)

Only Fitter asks for

  • FITTER_PLUGINS

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Scrapezy · What it can do: Fitter · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built