Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Sequa.AI vs TI-Toolbox

Sequa.AI is an MCP server published by sequa-ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). TI-Toolbox is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Ido Haber. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-24. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceSequa.AITI-Toolbox
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:f4e0e271c5c5
Forks (GitHub): 5
Pulls (Docker Hub): 10 566
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 22
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Community marketplace idossha/ti-toolbox Not listed Listed
Version: 0.6.1
Forks (GitHub): 12
Stars (GitHub): 36
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Sequa.AI vs TI-Toolbox
FactSequa.AITI-Toolbox
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)22 (worse)36 (better)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)10 566No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5 (worse)12 (better)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-23
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/sequa)Installs as a plugin bundle
Transport (differs)stdioNot stated
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)Not a bundle8
Licence (differs)MITGPL-3.0
Repository (differs)github.com/sequa-ai/sequa-mcpgithub.com/idossha/ti-toolbox
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)03
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-21

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Sequa.AI

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Stop stitching context for Copilot and Cursor. With Sequa MCP, your AI tools know your entire codebase and docs out of the box.

TI-Toolbox

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

TI-Toolbox for AI agents: skills (usage, scripting API, domain, codebase, running pipelines) + MCP servers (read-only wiki/source/project reader; job driver for the running app).

How to run each

Sequa.AI As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "API_KEY=<YOUR_API_KEY>" --transport stdio sequa -- docker run -i --rm -e API_KEY mcp/sequa

Requires: API_KEY (secret)

TI-Toolbox As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add idossha/ti-toolbox
/plugin install ti-toolbox@ti-toolbox

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of TI-Toolbox publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of TI-Toolbox publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Sequa.AI · What it can do: TI-Toolbox · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built