Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Sequa.AI vs Memory Fabric

Sequa.AI is an MCP server published by sequa-ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Memory Fabric is an MCP server published by elViRafa. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceSequa.AIMemory Fabric
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:f4e0e271c5c5
Forks (GitHub): 5
Pulls (Docker Hub): 10 290
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 22
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.4.4
Downloads/month (PyPI): 738
Downloads/week (PyPI): 129
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Sequa.AI vs Memory Fabric
FactSequa.AIMemory Fabric
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)22 (better)2 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)10 290No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-13
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/sequa)On your machine (memory-fabric)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/sequa-ai/sequa-mcpgithub.com/elvirafa/agentic-memory
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)04
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Sequa.AI

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Stop stitching context for Copilot and Cursor. With Sequa MCP, your AI tools know your entire codebase and docs out of the box.

Memory Fabric

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

File-first, local-first MCP memory for AI coding assistants: Markdown + YAML, no vector DB.

How to run each

Sequa.AI As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "API_KEY=<YOUR_API_KEY>" --transport stdio sequa -- docker run -i --rm -e API_KEY mcp/sequa

Requires: API_KEY (secret)

Memory Fabric As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio memory-fabric -- uvx --from "memory-fabric[mcp]==1.4.4" memory-fabric-mcp memory-fabric

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Memory Fabric publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Memory Fabric publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Sequa.AI · What it can do: Memory Fabric · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built