Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Sequa.AI vs io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow

Sequa.AI is an MCP server published by sequa-ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow is an MCP server published by ronmiz. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-24. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceSequa.AIio.github.ronmiz/infernoflow
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:f4e0e271c5c5
Forks (GitHub): 5
Pulls (Docker Hub): 10 566
Stars (Docker Hub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 22
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.46.5
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 8
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Sequa.AI vs io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow
FactSequa.AIio.github.ronmiz/infernoflow
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)22 (better)8 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)10 566No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)5 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-23
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/sequa)On your machine (infernoflow)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)1Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 11, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/sequa-ai/sequa-mcpgithub.com/ronmiz/infernoflow
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)03
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-23

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Sequa.AI

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Stop stitching context for Copilot and Cursor. With Sequa MCP, your AI tools know your entire codebase and docs out of the box.

io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Git-native memory for coding agents: gotchas, decisions and bookmarks as plain text in your repo.

How to run each

Sequa.AI As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "API_KEY=<YOUR_API_KEY>" --transport stdio sequa -- docker run -i --rm -e API_KEY mcp/sequa

Requires: API_KEY (secret)

io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio infernoflow -- npx -y infernoflow mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only Sequa.AI asks for

  • API_KEY (secret)
  • MCP_SERVER_URL

Only io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow asks for

  • INFERNOFLOW_PROJECT_DIR

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Sequa.AI · What it can do: io.github.ronmiz/infernoflow · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built