Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Short.io vs Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP

Short.io is an MCP server published by docker. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP is an MCP server published by stufently. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-20. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceShort.ioBing Webmaster AI CLI MCP
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: not stated
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.4
Downloads/month (PyPI): 0
Downloads/week (PyPI): 283
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Short.io vs Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP
FactShort.ioBing Webmaster AI CLI MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-14
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (ai-assistant.short.io/mcp)On your machine (bing-webmaster-ai-cli-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 12, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)Apache-2.0Not stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/stufently/bing-webmaster-ai-cli-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)01
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Answered with HTTP 400 (2 days ago)no remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Short.io

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Access to Short.io's link shortener and analytics tools.

Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read Bing Webmaster data and change it, directly or through a reviewed plan.

How to run each

Short.io As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http short-io https://ai-assistant.short.io/mcp

Requires: SHORT_IO_API_KEY (secret)

Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "BING_WM_API_KEY=<YOUR_BING_WM_API_KEY>" --transport stdio bing-webmaster-ai-cli-mcp -- uvx bing-webmaster-ai-cli-mcp

Requires: BING_WM_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Short.io has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only Short.io asks for

  • SHORT_IO_API_KEY (secret)

Only Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP asks for

  • BING_WM_ALLOW_WRITES
  • BING_WM_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Short.io · What it can do: Bing Webmaster AI CLI MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built