Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

VeyraX vs Sealgate

VeyraX is an MCP server published by VeyraX. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). Sealgate is an MCP server published by Edison-Watch. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceVeyraXSealgate
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:257d91533072
Forks (GitHub): 19
Pulls (Docker Hub): 18 432
Stars (Docker Hub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 48
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Downloads/month (npm): 151
Downloads/week (npm): 23
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

VeyraX vs Sealgate
FactVeyraXSealgate
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)48 (better)1 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)18 432No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)19 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/veyrax)Remote server (mcp.sealgate.ai/mcp/%7Bapi_key%7D)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)3Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 12, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/veyrax/veyrax-mcpgithub.com/edison-watch/sealgate-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkAnswered with HTTP 404 (3 days ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

VeyraX

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

VeyraX MCP is the only connection you need to access all your tools in any MCP-compatible environment.

Sealgate

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Sealgate gateway proxy: list governed MCP servers and review agent session and audit status.

How to run each

VeyraX As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "VEYRAX_API_KEY=<YOUR_VEYRAX_API_KEY>" --transport stdio veyrax -- docker run -i --rm -e VEYRAX_API_KEY mcp/veyrax

Requires: VEYRAX_API_KEY (secret)

Sealgate

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: SEALGATE_API_KEY (secret), SEALGATE_GATEWAY_URL

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Sealgate has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of Sealgate publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only VeyraX asks for

  • VEYRAX_API_KEY (secret)

Only Sealgate asks for

  • SEALGATE_API_KEY (secret)
  • SEALGATE_GATEWAY_URL

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: VeyraX · What it can do: Sealgate · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built